PAHO/WHO Equity, Health and Human Development –
Lista Equidad
Editorial
Health research prioritization: global and regional perspectives
Mandil A; Rashidian A; Hajjeh R. Health research prioritization: global and regional perspectives. East Mediterr Health J. 2020;26(3):254-256. https://doi.org/10.26719/2020.26.3.254
Published online: March 2020
“The Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR) is confronting unprecedented health challenges, exacerbated by demographic and epidemiologic changes, large burden of communicable and noncommunicable
diseases, increasing health care costs, as well as the effects of contracted emergencies, social conflicts and massive population movements. These challenges have significantly impacted the delivery of health care services, but they have also affected the
capacity of the Region to conduct health research. In order to improve the health status in the EMR, evidence-based policies are critical. In October 2019, the Eastern Mediterranean Regional Committee endorsed a resolution supporting the improvement of national
institutional capacity for evidence-informed policy-making for health in all Member States. Research that focuses on the regional and national health priorities is essential to develop the evidence needed for region- and countryspecific solutions. The World
Health Organization (WHO) has identified four pillars as part of a comprehensive strategy that addresses research for health: 1) capacity building; 2) standards and governance; 3) translation of research to policy and practice; and 4) research priority setting
(8). Priority setting helps to identify the resources needed for research, in particular as available resources are limited and waste cannot be afforded (9). Setting priorities for research can be a complex and tedious process. While different approaches to
research prioritization exist, there is no clear consensus on what constitutes best practice. Regardless of the approach followed, there are minimum criteria to be considered and followed in setting research priorities. When setting research priorities, countries
and large institutions (including academic and research institutions) should follow approaches that take into consideration their needs and context (10). Furthermore, countries need to be aware of potential barriers to priority setting (e.g., linkage to identified
national health priorities, involvement of stakeholders in the process, time and resources required for priority setting, and selection of appropriate priority setting approaches including reaching consensus among stakeholders). This includes barriers to implementing…”
Full text /
Texto completo (Inglés solamente):
http://bit.ly/LEquidad202004
The author/source alone is responsible for the views expressed in this article/publication or information resource, and they do not necessarily
represent the positions, decisions or policies of the Pan American Health Organization.
= El autor/fuente es el único responsable por las opiniones expresadas en este artículo/publicación o recurso de información y no necesariamente representan las posiciones, decisiones o políticas
de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud.
|
Pan American Health Organization, Regional Office of the World Health Organization for the Americas -
http://www.paho.org
Department of Evidence and Intelligence for Action in Health (EIH)
For additional information and to learn how to send contributions, please follow this link
http://equity.bvsalud.org/general-criteria/
or contact Eliane P. Santos - Advisor, Knowledge Management and Networks – KMP/DD/ PAHO - [log in to unmask]
If you want to subscribe/unsubscribe from Equidad / Si desea registrarse/salir de la lista click
here. |